
§
ARITH
§ ASAP
§ ASP-DAC
§ DAC
§ DATE
§ FPGA
§ GLSVLSI *new
§ HIPC
§ HPCA
§ ICCAD
§ ICCD
§ IITC
§ ISCA
§ ISCAS
§ ISQED
§ ISLPED
§ ISVLSI *new
§ MICRO
§ SLIP
§ SAMOS
§ SOCC
§ SPI
§ VLSID
§ VLSI-SOC
§ SBCCI
§ GLOBECOM
For CSE
(Computational Intelligence etc.,) Related Conferences
Click here-Link 1
Networking related
conferences
World Time
Acceptance rates of CSE Related
Conferences
Artificial Intelligence related
§
9th IEEE International Conference on Design
Automation and Test in
|
DATE: Papers Acceptance Statistics |
|||
|
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
Rate |
|
2006 |
834 |
267 |
32% |
|
2005 |
825 |
176 |
21% |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
DAC: Papers Acceptance Statistics |
|||
|
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
Rate |
|
2005 |
735 |
154 |
21% |
|
2004 |
785 |
163 |
21% |
|
2003 |
628 |
152 |
24% |
|
2002 |
491 |
147 |
30% |
|
2001 |
410 |
160 |
39% |
|
2000 |
390 |
142 |
36% |
|
1999 |
451 |
154 |
34% |
|
1998 |
390 |
142 |
36% |
|
1997 |
400 |
139 |
35% |
|
1996 |
377 |
142 |
38% |
|
1994 |
260 |
100 |
38% |
|
1990 |
427 |
125 |
29% |
|
1989 |
465 |
156 |
34% |
|
1988 |
400 |
125 |
31% |
|
1987 |
351 |
138 |
39% |
|
1986 |
300 |
124 |
41% |
|
1984 |
290 |
116 |
40% |

|
ICCAD: Papers Acceptance Statistics |
|||
|
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
Rate |
|
2003 |
490 |
129 |
26% |
|
2004 |
|
|
24% |
|
2005 |
|
|
25% |
|
|
|
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
Average |
||||||||
|
11. |
ICCAD |
30.56% |
27.55% |
26.32% |
24.42% |
|
|
27.21% |
||||||||
§
ASPDAC'07, Japan, Jan 2007 (131 out of 408 papers
were accepted: 32.1%)
§
ASPDAC'06, Japan, Jan 2006 (135 out of 432 papers
were accepted: 31.25%)
§
ASP-DAC 2005 (Acceptance rate 40%, full paper acceptance rate: 14.3%)
§ IEEE Intl. Conference ASP-DAC 2004-Acceptance rate 50%
§ ISCAS - 2007 - Acceptance rate - 49%
§ 38th IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS) 2006 (1439 papers accepted out of 2429 submissions) Acceptance rate - 59%
§ ISCAS - 2004 - Acceptance rate - 34.9%
§
7th IEEE International Symposium on Quality
Electronic Design (ISQED) 2006 (blind
review, 93 regular papers accepted out of 256 submissions, acceptance rate - 36.3%
§
83 papers
were accepted for regular from 222 papers--- ISQED 2005.---37.3%
§
49 papers
were accepted for regular presentation from 148 papers-- ISQED 2004.--33.1 %+12 Short (41.2)
§
39 papers regular
presentation from119 ---ISQED 2003---32.8 %---+ 16 (46.2%)
§
International Conference on VLSI Design
(VLSID 2007) 141 papers accepted out of
444 submissions, acceptance rate - 31.76%)
§
International Conference on VLSI Design
(VLSID 2006) (blind review, 88 regular
papers accepted out of 328 submissions, acceptance rate - 26.8%); (88 regular
papers and 48 short papers accepted out of 328 submissions, acceptance rate
- 41.5%)
§ Proceedings of 18th Intl. Conf. on VLSI Design, IEEE Computer Press (VLSID), 2005 (blind review, 97 regular papers accepted out of 352 submissions, acceptance rate - 28%)
§
Intl. Conf. on VLSI Design, IEEE Computer
Press, 2003, (Acceptance rate 39%)
§ GLSVLSI 2007 --- 34 full papers + 34 short papers + 46 posters out of 324 submissions
Acceptance Rate ---- Full paper - 10.5 %, Full + Short papers: 21 %, Full + Short + Posters: 35.18 %
§
This time from
|
GLVLSI: Papers Acceptance Statistics |
|||
|
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
Rate |
|
2006 |
219 |
82 |
37% |

§
GLSVLSI
2006---82 out of 219 got accepted---37.4% (Full paper 44 / 219 = 20.10%)
§
GLSVLSI
2005---102 out of 239 got accepted---42.68% (Full paper 52 / 239 = 21.76%)
§
GLSVLSI
2004---40%
§
GLSVLSI 2003---Full
paper 12.5%
|
FPGA: Papers Acceptance Statistics |
|||
|
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
Rate |
|
2006 |
100 |
22 |
22% |
§
15 th
ACM/SIGDA International Symposium on Field-Programmable Gate Arrays,
§ IEEE International SOC Conference (SOCC) 2006, blind review, 53 regular papers accepted out of 169 submissions, acceptance rate - 31.3%
§ ISVLSI-2007 - 68 out of 178 full papers were accepted, acceptance rate - 38.2%.
§
ISVLSI
Germany, March 2006 (64/151=42.4% acceptance rate)
§
IEEE
CS Annual Symposium on VLSI (ISVLSI) 2005 (37 regular papers and 31 poster
papers accepted out of 126 submissions, acceptance rate - 53.9%, full paper 29.4% )
§
17th IEEE Symposium on
Computer Arithmetic (ARITH'05) – 34 out of 86 – (39.53%)
§
16th IEEE Symposium on
Computer Arithmetic (ARITH'03) – 34 out of 101 – (33.66%)
§
15th IEEE Symposium on
Computer Arithmetic (ARITH'01) – 30 out of 50 – (60.00%)
§
14th IEEE Symposium on
Computer Arithmetic (ARITH'99) – 31 out of 67 – (46.27%)
§
12th IEEE Symposium on
Computer Arithmetic (ARITH'95) – 31 out of 80 – (38.75%)
|
SLIP:
Papers Acceptance Statistics |
|||
|
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
Rate |
|
2007 |
18 |
12 |
67% |
§ SLIP 2007 - 67% - 12 Regular Papers + 3 Invited talks more details. ACM Portal Proceedings Link
§
8th SLIP 2006 - 13 Regular papers + 3
Invited talks (Speakers represent multiple countries in Europe, North America
and
§ SLIP 2005 - 10 Regular papers + 4 Invited talks
§ SLIP 2004 - 16 Regular papers
§ SLIP 2003 - 15 Regular papers + 3 Invited talks
§ SLIP 2002 - 15 Regular papers
§
15th
IEEE ASAP Conference 2004 = 43 / 90 = 47.8
% (+ 16 invited papers - Total 320 reviews - average - 3 , max - 4 reviews
§
16th IEEE ASAP Conference 2005 = 46 / 100 = 46.0 % ( Only 80 considered for
review, 24 long and 22 short papers + 16 invited papers)
SAMOS-2007 - 27% (Roughly out of around 93 submissions)
SBCCI 2007 – Total all papers acceptance rate 55%
|
SBCCI: Papers Acceptance Statistics |
|||
|
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
Rate |
|
2005(18 th) |
118 |
42 |
36% |
|
2004(17th) |
148 |
48 |
32% |
GLOBECOM 2006- Acceptance Rate-40%
GLOBECOM 2004-Acceptance Rate-37.7%
GLOBECOM 2003-Acceptance Rate-36.3%
|
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
|
|
|
1020 |
357 |
35% |
|||
|
1525+ |
718 |
47% |
|||
|
1980 |
606 |
30.6% |
|||
|
2,250 |
816 |
36.3% |
|||
|
2,086 |
792 |
37.7% |
|||
|
1,638 |
770 |
47.7% |
|||
For other detailed information of related conferences to Globecom click here
IWSOC
(International Workshop on System On Chip) in DBLP
|
|
|
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
Average |
|
1. |
ASPLOS |
- |
13.71% |
- |
14.20% |
- |
|
13.96% |
|
2. |
ISCA |
14.72% |
15.00% |
19.56% |
14.28% |
23.20% |
|
17.35% |
|
3. |
HPCA |
23.63% |
20.00% |
21.98% |
17.64% |
15.46% |
15.12% |
18.97% |
|
4. |
PLDI |
20.83% |
16.56% |
21.37% |
19.53% |
20.74% |
|
19.81% |
|
5. |
PACT |
20.63% |
21.01% |
16.67% |
18.85% |
25.21% |
|
20.47% |
|
6. |
MICRO |
20.14% |
24.00% |
26.11% |
18.35% |
19.73% |
|
22.15% |
|
7. |
ISLPED (regular) |
26.28% |
24.69% |
24.43% |
27.45% |
22.75% |
|
25.12% |
|
8. |
ICS |
33.83% |
21.52% |
21.05% |
21.60% |
27.63% |
|
25.13% |
|
9. |
DAC |
39.02% |
29.93% |
24.20% |
20.76% |
20.95% |
|
26.97% |
|
10. |
DATE |
35.55% |
29.83% |
25.76% |
23.21% |
21.33% |
|
27.14% |
|
11. |
ICCAD |
30.56% |
27.55% |
26.32% |
24.42% |
|
|
27.21% |
|
12. |
HiPC |
26.85% |
39.31% |
29.27% |
18.97% |
|
|
28.60% |
|
13. |
ICCD (regular) |
33.70% |
27.16% |
26.18% |
28.76% |
23.00% |
|
29.62% |
|
14. |
Euro-Par (regular) |
33.33% |
25.28% |
32.24% |
34.65% |
31.19% |
|
31.34% |
|
15. |
ISPASS |
? |
- |
35% |
35.29% |
29.35% |
|
32.32% |
|
16. |
SBAC-PAD |
? |
33.78% |
30.10% |
34.41% |
34,94% |
|
32.76% |
|
17. |
CGO |
- |
- |
35.37% |
31.65% |
34.67% |
|
33.89% |
|
18. |
ICPP |
46.76% |
35.64% |
35.94% |
34.21% |
28.63% |
|
36.24% |
|
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
|
191 |
32 |
16.8% |
2 |
??? |
||
|
297 |
36 |
12.1% |
2 |
??? |
||
|
158 |
35 |
22.2% |
2 |
??? |
||
|
218 |
33 |
15.1% |
2 |
??? |
||
|
260 |
31 |
11.9% |
2 |
??? |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
ANCS (IEEE/ACM) |
100 |
23 |
23.0% |
1 |
??? |
|
|
97 |
19 |
19.6% |
1 |
??? |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
64 |
17 |
26.6% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
85 |
17 |
20.0% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
83 |
16 |
19.3% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
131 |
28 |
21.4% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
153 |
27 |
17.6% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
153 |
27 |
17.6% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
256 |
38 |
14.8% |
1 |
??? |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
126 |
48 |
38.1% |
3 |
162 |
||
|
108 |
27 |
25.0% |
3 |
220 |
||
|
114 |
39 |
34.2% |
3 |
300 |
||
|
138 |
38 |
27.5% |
3 |
200+ |
||
|
235 |
76 |
32.3% |
3 |
300 |
||
|
257 |
61 |
23.7% |
3 |
189 |
||
|
218 |
72 |
33.0% |
3 |
330 |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
Cluster (IEEE) |
144 |
34 |
23.6% |
1.5 |
161 |
|
|
74 |
35 |
47.3% |
1.5 |
304 |
||
|
116 |
45 |
38.8% |
3 |
283 |
||
|
164 |
48 |
29.3% |
3 |
176 |
||
|
150 |
48 |
32.0% |
2 |
200 |
||
|
138 |
45 |
32.6% |
2 |
~200 |
||
|
127 |
42 |
33.1% |
2 |
210 |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
CNSR |
81 |
36 |
44.4% |
2 |
70++ |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
110 |
21 |
19.1% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
86 |
19 |
22.1% |
1 |
??? |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
DSN |
377 |
83 |
22.0% |
3 |
??? |
|
|
319 |
78 |
24.5% |
3 |
??? |
||
|
287 |
57 |
19.9% |
2 |
~350 |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
DSOM (IFIP/IEEE) |
1997 |
40 |
24 |
60.0% |
1 |
??? |
|
1998 |
48 |
24 |
50.0% |
1 |
??? |
|
|
1999 |
54 |
20 |
37.0% |
1 |
80 |
|
|
65 |
21 |
32.3% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
76 |
26 |
34.2% |
1 |
72 |
||
|
41 |
16 |
39.0% |
1 |
41 |
||
|
86 |
20 |
23.3% |
1 |
54 |
||
|
90 |
20 |
22.2% |
1 |
54 |
||
|
87 |
23 |
26.4% |
1 |
80 |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
66 |
24 |
36.4% |
1 |
91 |
||
|
173 |
25 |
14.4% |
1 |
??? |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|||||
|
180 |
50 |
27.8% |
2 |
??? |
|||||||
|
1996 |
383 |
214 |
55.9% |
5 |
??? |
||||||
|
297 |
154 |
51.9% |
5 |
??? |
|||||||
|
238 |
129 |
54.2% |
5 |
??? |
|||||||
|
343 |
188 |
54.8% |
5 |
??? |
|||||||
|
326 |
167 |
51.2% |
5 |
??? |
|||||||
|
207 |
111 |
53.7% |
4 |
??? |
|||||||
|
265 |
125 |
47.0% |
4 |
??? |
338 |
155 |
46.0% |
5 |
??? |
||
|
352 |
124 |
35.2% |
5 |
??? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
388 |
121 |
31.2% |
5 |
??? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
290 |
110 |
37.9% |
3 |
??? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
EuroSys |
144 |
29 |
20.1% |
1 |
177 |
|
|
131 |
29 |
22.1% |
1 |
220 |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
EWSN |
133 |
21 |
15.8% |
1 |
??? |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
FORTE (IFIP) |
1988 |
?? |
18 |
??.?% |
1 |
118 |
|
1989 |
?? |
28 |
??.?% |
1 |
140 |
|
|
1990 |
110 |
22 |
20.0% |
1 |
256 |
|
|
1991 |
70 |
29 |
41.4% |
1 |
83 |
|
|
1992 |
116 |
29 |
25.0% |
1 |
201 |
|
|
1993 |
93 |
29 |
31.2% |
1 |
97 |
|
|
1994 |
121 |
27 |
22.3% |
1 |
??? |
|
|
1995 |
80 |
30 |
37.5% |
1 |
125 |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
FORTE (IFIP) |
1988 |
?? |
18 |
??.?% |
1 |
118 |
|
1989 |
?? |
28 |
??.?% |
1 |
140 |
|
|
1990 |
110 |
22 |
20.0% |
1 |
256 |
|
|
1991 |
70 |
29 |
41.4% |
1 |
83 |
|
|
1992 |
116 |
29 |
25.0% |
1 |
201 |
|
|
1993 |
93 |
29 |
31.2% |
1 |
97 |
|
|
1994 |
121 |
27 |
22.3% |
1 |
??? |
|
|
1995 |
80 |
30 |
37.5% |
1 |
125 |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
FORTE/PSTV (IFIP) |
110 |
28 |
25.5% |
1 |
140 |
|
|
115 |
33 |
28.7% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
85 |
26 |
30.6% |
1 |
132 |
||
|
78 |
22 |
34.6% |
1 |
130 |
||
|
63 |
22 |
34.9% |
1 |
95 |
||
|
51 |
24 |
47.0% |
1 |
122 |
||
|
54 |
22 |
40.7% |
1 |
70 |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
117 |
28 |
23.9% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
113 |
28 |
24.8% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
74 |
18 |
24.3% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
2002 |
142 |
28 |
19.7% |
1 |
??? |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
1020 |
357 |
35% |
? |
1548 |
||
|
1525+ |
718 |
47% |
? |
1403 |
||
|
1980 |
606 |
30.6% |
? |
1403 |
||
|
2,250 |
816 |
36.3% |
??? |
1447 |
||
|
2,086 |
792 |
37.7% |
7 symposia |
??? |
||
|
1,638 |
770 |
47.7% |
7 symposia |
??? |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
Grid |
173 |
40 |
23.1% |
1 |
390 |
|
|
170 |
32 |
18.8% |
1 |
450 |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
108 |
29 |
26.9% |
??? |
220 |
||
|
145 |
57 |
39.3% |
??? |
??? |
||
|
164 |
48 |
29.3% |
5 |
??? |
||
|
214 |
48 |
22.4% |
5 |
??? |
||
|
362 |
50 |
13.8% |
5 |
~300 |
||
|
335 |
52 |
15.5% |
6 |
??? |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
HPDC |
125 |
25 |
20.0% |
1 |
??? |
|
|
149 |
24 |
16.1% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
133 |
24 |
18.0% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
157 |
24 |
15.3% |
1 |
??? |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
HPSR |
116 |
53 |
45.7% |
1.5 |
120 |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
ICASSP (IEEE) |
1490 |
867 |
58.2% |
??? |
??? |
|
|
2000 |
??? |
??? |
??.?% |
??? |
??? |
|
|
1916 |
975 |
50.9% |
??? |
??? |
||
|
1770 |
1007 |
56.9% |
??? |
??? |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
ICC (IEEE) |
1145 |
628 |
54.8% |
2 (plus 8 symposia) |
1390 |
|
|
1568 |
655 |
41.8% |
11 symposia |
??? |
||
|
1879 |
704 |
37.5% |
15 |
1036 |
||
|
2946 |
864 |
29.0% |
18 |
1501 |
||
|
2000 |
692 |
35.0% |
8 |
??? |
||
|
2517 |
982 |
39.0% |
9 |
??? |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
ICCCN |
237 |
66 |
27.8% |
3 |
??? |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
ICDCS (IEEE) |
217 |
69 |
31.8% |
3 |
270 |
|
|
406 |
72 |
17.7% |
3 |
? |
||
|
475 |
84 |
17.7% |
3 |
? |
||
|
540 |
75 |
13.8% |
3 |
? |
||
|
528 |
71 |
13.5% |
3 |
? |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
ICODP (IFIP) |
1991 |
60 |
22 |
30.0% |
1 |
90 |
|
1993 |
60 |
22 |
30.0% |
1 |
110 |
|
|
1995 |
?? |
30 |
??.?% |
1 |
150 |
|
|
1997 |
?? |
30 |
??.?% |
1 |
180 |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
1996 |
96 |
31 |
32.3% |
1 |
??? |
|
|
1997 |
81 |
32 |
39.5 |
1 |
??? |
|
|
108 |
36 |
33.3% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
131 |
36 |
27.5% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
109 |
30 |
27.5% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
157 |
36 |
22.9% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
217 |
32 |
14.7% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
230 |
30 |
13.0% |
1 |
128 |
||
|
213 |
33 |
15.5% |
1 |
81 |
||
|
212 |
36 |
17.0% |
1 |
130 |
||
|
232 |
33 |
14.2% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
220 |
32 |
14.5% |
1 |
??? |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
ICPP |
139 |
65 |
46.7% |
1 |
??? |
|
|
188 |
67 |
35.6% |
3 |
??? |
||
|
192 |
69 |
35.9% |
3 |
??? |
||
|
190 |
65 |
34.2% |
3 |
??? |
||
|
241 |
69 |
28.6% |
3 |
??? |
||
|
200 |
64 |
32.0% |
3 |
??? |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
ICQT |
19 |
10 |
52.6% |
1 |
40 |
|
|
20 |
10 |
50.0% |
1 |
81 (QofIS & ICQT) |
||
|
27 |
8 |
29.6% |
1 |
72 (ICQT & NGC) |
||
|
22 |
8 |
36.4% |
1 |
103 (QofIS, ICQT and WQoSR) |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
1989 |
93 |
46 |
49.5% |
3 |
??? |
|
|
1991 |
110 |
50 |
45.5% |
3 |
??? |
|
|
1993 |
100 |
50 |
50.0% |
3 |
550 |
|
|
1995 |
109 |
50 |
45.9% |
3 |
500 |
|
|
1997 |
138 |
56 |
40.6% |
3 |
??? |
|
|
1999 |
161 |
61 |
37.8% |
3 |
570 |
|
|
150 |
51 |
34.0% |
3 |
283 |
||
|
149 |
41 |
27.5% |
3 |
154 |
||
|
226 |
53 |
23.5% |
3 |
320 |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|||||
|
IMC (ACM/USENIX) |
53 |
14 |
26.4% |
1 |
60 |
||||||
|
93 |
39 |
41.9% |
1 |
103 |
|||||||
|
109 |
32 |
29.4% |
1 |
114 |
|||||||
|
157 |
39 |
24.8% |
1 |
109 |
|||||||
|
148 |
36 |
24.3% |
1 |
??? |
155 |
34 |
21.9% |
1 |
??? |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
470 |
156 |
33.2% |
4 |
??? |
||
|
590 |
176 |
29.8% |
4 |
??? |
||
|
524 |
167 |
31.9% |
4 |
??? |
||
|
800 |
172 |
21.5% |
4 |
??? |
||
|
600 |
184 |
30.7% |
5 |
??? |
||
|
735 |
192 |
26.1% |
5 |
550 |
||
|
830 |
192 |
23.1% |
5 |
??? |
||
|
938 |
192 |
20.5% |
5 |
??? |
||
|
1078 |
224 |
20.8% |
5 |
??? |
||
|
1420 |
261 |
18.4% |
6 |
??? |
||
|
1419 |
244 |
17.2% |
6 |
??? |
||
|
>1400 |
252 |
~18% |
6 |
??? |
||
|
>1400 |
252 |
~18% |
6 |
??? |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
??? |
?? |
28.0% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
115 |
37 |
32.2% |
1 |
? |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
353 |
126 |
35.7% |
3 |
400 |
||
|
298 |
112 |
37.6% |
3 |
429 |
||
|
324 |
118 |
36.4% |
3 |
456 |
||
|
260 |
113 |
43.5% |
3 |
460 |
||
|
303 |
107 |
35.3% |
3 |
402 |
||
|
276 |
100 |
36.2% |
3 |
465 |
||
|
258 |
98 |
38.0% |
3 |
445 |
||
|
407 |
119 |
29.2% |
4 |
550 |
||
|
447 |
142 |
31.8% |
4 |
617 |
||
|
343 |
115 |
33.5% |
4 |
588 |
||
|
531 |
125 |
23.5% |
4 |
542 |
||
|
419 |
109 |
26.0% |
4 |
656 |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
IPOM (IEEE) |
55 |
19 |
34.5% |
1 |
45 |
|
|
130 |
44 |
33.9% |
2 |
100 |
||
|
46 |
21 |
45.6% |
1 |
50 |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
IPS-MoMe |
31 |
26 |
83.9% |
1 |
32 |
|
|
37 |
25 |
70.3% |
1 |
50 |
||
|
42 |
27 |
64.3% |
1 |
70 |
||
|
34 |
18 |
52.9% |
1 |
63 |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
IPSN |
145 |
25 (+25 poster papers) |
17.2% |
1 |
??? |
|
|
2005 |
??? |
?? (+?? poster papers) |
??.?% |
1 |
??? |
|
|
165 |
25 (+17 poster papers) |
15.2% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
170 |
26 (+12 poster papers) |
15.3% |
1 |
??? |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
99 |
31 |
31.3% |
1 |
55 |
||
|
166 |
27 |
16.3% |
1 |
?? |
||
|
145 |
27 |
18.6% |
1 |
66 |
||
|
124 |
24 |
19.4% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
90 |
24 |
26.7% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
90 |
21 |
23.3% |
1 |
49 |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
??? |
95 |
??.?% |
? |
??? |
||
|
??? |
106 |
??.?% |
? |
??? |
||
|
??? |
130 |
??.?% |
? |
??? |
||
|
119 |
66 |
55.5% |
3 |
88 |
||
|
224 |
123 |
54.9% |
3 |
??? |
||
|
206 |
113 |
54.9% |
3 |
136 |
||
|
280 |
154 |
55.0% |
3 |
177 |
||
|
455 |
228 |
50.1% |
4 |
236 |
||
|
475 |
187 |
39.4% |
3 |
195 |
||
|
400 |
147 |
36.8% |
4 |
195 |
||
|
348 |
161 |
46.3% |
4 |
186 |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
ISPDC |
84 |
45 |
53.6% |
1 |
35-40 |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
IWAN |
53 |
20 |
37.8% |
1 |
??? |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
IWQoS (IEEE) |
1994(1st) |
15 |
15 |
100.0% |
1 |
45 |
|
1994(2nd) |
15 |
15 |
100.0% |
1 |
40 |
|
|
1995 |
15 |
15 |
100.0% |
1 |
80 |
|
|
1996 |
30 |
15 |
50.0% |
1 |
90 |
|
|
1997 |
106 |
24 |
22.6% |
1 |
??? |
|
|
125 |
21 |
16.8% |
1 |
160 |
||
|
120 |
21 |
17.5% |
1 |
130 |
||
|
84 |
21 |
25.0% |
1 |
130 |
||
|
143 |
30 |
21.0% |
1 |
120 |
||
|
143 |
27 |
18.9% |
1 |
60 |
||
|
2003 |
??? |
?? |
??.?% |
? |
?? |
|
|
154 |
30 (6 are short) |
19.5% |
1 |
80 |
||
|
120 |
23 (plus 17 short) |
19.2% |
1 |
80 |
||
|
150 |
27 (plus 13 short) |
18.0% |
1 |
?? |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
128 |
70 |
54.7% |
4 |
115 |
||
|
100 |
49 |
49.0% |
3 |
80 |
||
|
140 |
58 |
41.0% |
3 |
130 |
||
|
146 |
49 |
33.6% |
3 |
138 |
||
|
142 |
42 |
30.4% |
3 |
144 |
||
|
212 |
56 |
26.4% |
3 |
152 |
||
|
172 |
60 |
34.9% |
3 |
173 |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
MASS (IEEE) |
197 |
49 |
24.9% |
1 |
??? |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
Middleware (IFIP/ACM) |
150 |
28 |
18.7% |
1 |
160 |
|
|
70 |
21 |
30.0% |
1 |
180 |
||
|
116 |
30 |
25.9% |
1 |
105 |
||
|
158 |
25 |
15.8% |
1 |
176 |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
MMCN (SPIE/ACM) |
100 |
24 (8 are short) |
24.0% |
1 |
??? |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
MMNS (IFIP/IEEE) |
1997 |
83 |
22 |
26.5% |
1 |
80+ |
|
1998 |
61 |
22 |
36.1% |
1 |
60+ |
|
|
2000 |
49 |
22 |
44.9% |
1 |
40+ |
|
|
105 |
22 |
21.0% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
76 |
27 |
35.5% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
66 |
34 |
51.1% |
1 |
??? |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
Mobiarch (IEEE/ACM) |
33 |
11 |
33.3% |
1 |
33 |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
1995 |
79 |
20 |
25.3% |
1 |
??? |
|
|
1996 |
90 |
18 |
20.0% |
1 |
??? |
|
|
1997 |
101 |
26 |
25.7% |
1 |
??? |
|
|
1998 |
147 |
27 |
18.4% |
1 |
??? |
|
|
1999 |
170 |
23 |
13.5% |
1 |
??? |
|
|
226 |
28 |
12.3% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
281 |
30 |
10.7% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
364 |
26 |
7.1% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
281 |
27 |
9.6% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
327 |
26 |
8.0% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
224 |
23 |
10.3% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
298 |
35 |
11.7% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
233 |
26 |
11.1% |
1 |
??? |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
82 |
13 |
15.6% |
1 |
165 |
||
|
144 |
24 |
16.7% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
134 |
22 |
16.4% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
189 |
29 |
15.3% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
234 |
24 |
10.1% |
1 |
200(?) |
||
|
281 |
40 |
14.2% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
318 |
31 |
9.75% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
146 |
27 |
18.5% |
1 |
??? |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
1998 |
20 |
8 |
40.0% |
1 |
??? |
|
|
1999 |
36 |
13 |
36.1% |
1 |
??? |
|
|
2000 |
44 |
16 |
36.4% |
1 |
??? |
|
|
2001 |
55 |
16 |
29.1% |
1 |
??? |
|
|
81 |
16 |
19.7% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
100 |
15 |
15.0% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
121 |
21 |
17.4% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
165 |
36 |
21.8% |
1 |
??? |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
1996 |
142 |
40 |
28.2% |
2 |
??? |
|
|
1997 |
162 |
36 |
22.2% |
2 |
??? |
|
|
? |
? |
? |
? |
??? |
||
|
220 |
40 |
18.2% |
? |
??? |
||
|
214 |
36 |
16.8% |
3 |
??? |
||
|
??? |
?? |
??.?% |
3 |
??? |
||
|
??? |
?? |
??.?% |
3 |
??? |
||
|
??? |
?? |
??.?% |
3 |
??? |
||
|
331 |
55 |
16.6% |
3 |
??? |
||
|
312 |
49 |
15.7% |
3 |
335 |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
NIME (IEEE) |
33 |
10 |
30.3% |
1 |
??? |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
51 |
15 |
29.4% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
66 |
16 |
24.2% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
79 |
16 |
20.3% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
82 |
17 |
20.7% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
98 |
16 |
16.3% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
124 |
16 |
12.9% |
1 |
~100 |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
Networking (IFIP) |
209 |
82 |
39.2% |
3 |
??? |
|
|
314 |
82 |
26.1% |
3 |
??? |
||
|
539 |
103 |
19.1% |
3 |
??? |
||
|
430 |
106 |
24.7% |
3 |
??? |
||
|
440 |
90 |
20.4% |
3 |
??? |
||
|
440 |
99 |
22.5% |
3 |
??? |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
NGC |
50 |
15 |
30.0% |
1 |
110 |
|
|
49 |
12 |
24.5% |
1 |
120 |
||
|
40 |
14 |
35.0% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
48 |
19 |
39.6% |
1 |
72 |
||
|
51 |
17 |
33.3% |
1 |
72 (ICQT & NGC) |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
205 |
61 |
29.7% |
3 |
485 |
||
|
173 |
57 |
32.9% |
3 |
264 |
||
|
224 |
60 |
26.8% |
3 |
425 |
||
|
186 |
53 |
28.5% |
3 |
331 |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
1990 |
??? |
??? |
??? |
1 |
??? |
|
|
1991 |
??? |
??? |
??? |
1 |
??? |
|
|
1992 |
??? |
??? |
??? |
1 |
??? |
|
|
1993 |
??? |
??? |
??? |
1 |
??? |
|
|
??? |
??? |
??? |
1 |
??? |
||
|
??? |
??? |
??? |
1 |
??? |
||
|
81 |
25 |
30.9% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
??? |
??? |
??? |
1 |
??? |
||
|
??? |
??? |
??? |
1 |
??? |
||
|
??? |
??? |
??? |
1 |
??? |
||
|
60 |
20 |
33.3% |
1 |
60 |
||
|
59 |
18 |
30.5% |
1 |
50 |
||
|
60 |
18 |
30.0% |
1 |
40 |
||
|
95 |
24 |
25.3% |
1 |
60 |
||
|
88 |
33 |
37.5% |
1 |
48 |
||
|
74 |
23 |
31.1% |
1 |
?? |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
NPC (IFIP) |
338 |
46 |
13.6% |
3 |
150+ |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
NSDI (USENIX) |
118 |
27 |
22.9% |
1 |
??? |
|
|
112 |
25 |
22.3% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
110 |
28 |
25.4% |
1 |
??? |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
OPENARCH (IEEE) |
42 |
13 |
31.0% |
1 |
??? |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
145 |
27 |
18.6% |
1 |
??? |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
OSDI (USENIX) |
1994 |
178 |
21 |
11.8% |
1 |
??? |
|
1996 |
110 |
19 |
17.3% |
1 |
??? |
|
|
1998 |
??? |
?? |
??.?% |
1 |
??? |
|
|
96 |
20 |
20.8% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
111 |
24 |
21.6% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
??? |
?? |
??.?% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
193 |
27 |
14.0% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
150 |
27 |
18.0% |
1 |
??? |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
21 |
4 |
19.1% |
1 |
69 |
||
|
29 |
16 |
55.2% |
1 |
66 |
||
|
70 |
19 |
27.1% |
1 |
77 |
||
|
130 |
30 |
23.1% |
1 |
79 |
||
|
136 |
26 |
19.1% |
1 |
57 |
||
|
153 |
29 |
19.0% |
1 |
80 |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
PerCom (IEEE) |
233 |
38 |
16.7% |
2 |
??? |
|
|
280 |
23 |
8.21% |
1 |
??? |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
PSTV (IFIP) |
1981 |
24 |
24 |
100.0% |
1 |
30 |
|
1982 |
40 |
40 |
100.0% |
1 |
41 |
|
|
1983 |
42 |
42 |
100.0% |
1 |
??? |
|
|
1984 |
41 |
41 |
100.0% |
1 |
??? |
|
|
1985 |
52 |
34 |
65.4% |
1 |
62 |
|
|
1986 |
48 |
34 |
70.8% |
1 |
??? |
|
|
1987 |
59 |
26 |
44.1% |
1 |
162 |
|
|
1988 |
75 |
28 |
37.3% |
1 |
??? |
|
|
1989 |
94 |
26 |
27.7% |
1 |
191 |
|
|
1990 |
67 |
23 |
34.3% |
1 |
187 |
|
|
1991 |
53 |
21 |
39.6% |
1 |
187 |
|
|
1992 |
89 |
22 |
24.7% |
1 |
??? |
|
|
1993 |
60 |
20 |
33.3% |
1 |
95 |
|
|
1994 |
51 |
27 |
52.9% |
1 |
??? |
|
|
1995 |
75 |
25 |
33.3% |
1 |
92 |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
PVM/MPI |
110 |
56 |
50.9% |
3 |
78 |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
PWC (IFIP) |
209 |
57 |
27.2% |
1 |
~120 |
|
|
174 |
49 |
28.2% |
1 |
??? |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
78 |
28 |
35.8% |
1 |
160 |
||
|
95 |
23 |
24.2% |
1 |
75 |
||
|
50 |
20 |
38.4% |
1 |
81 (QofIS & ICQT) |
||
|
76 |
22 |
28.9% |
1 |
50 |
||
|
91 |
22 |
24.2% |
1 |
103 (QofIS, ICQT and WQoSR) |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
2001 |
135 |
25 |
18.5% |
3 |
167 |
|
|
70 |
26 |
37.1% |
3 |
211 |
||
|
149 |
43 |
28.9% |
3 |
218 |
||
|
105 |
29 |
27.7% |
3 |
323 |
||
|
179 |
56 |
31.3% |
3 |
252 |
||
|
99 |
33 |
30.0% |
2 |
103 |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
SAWN (IEEE) |
121 |
30 |
24.8% |
1 |
??? |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
1999 |
90 |
43 |
47.7% |
1 |
??? |
|
|
2000 |
70 |
41 |
58.5% |
1 |
??? |
|
|
-- |
32 |
-- |
1 |
??? |
||
|
74 |
25 |
33.7% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
103 |
31 |
30.0% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
93 |
29 |
34.9% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
83 |
29 |
34.9% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
71 |
23 |
32.4% |
1 |
??? |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
||||||||||||||||||
|
SECON (IEEE) |
370 |
67 |
18.1% |
3 |
??? |
202 |
55 |
27.2% |
3 |
??? |
243 |
63 |
25.9% |
3 |
??? |
296 |
63 |
21.3% |
3 |
??? |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
83 |
24 |
28.9% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
2002 |
??? |
??? |
??.?% |
? |
??? |
|
|
2003 |
??? |
??? |
??.?% |
? |
??? |
|
|
184 |
22 |
12.0% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
148 |
22 |
14.9% |
1 |
??? |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
1999 |
61 |
15 |
24.6% |
1 |
??? |
|
|
2000 |
137 |
18 |
13.1% |
1 |
??? |
|
|
2003 |
131 |
19 |
14.5% |
1 |
??? |
|
|
192 |
19 |
9.9% |
1 |
200 |
||
|
192 |
17 |
8.9% |
1 |
200 |
||
|
251 |
32 |
12.8% |
1 |
??? |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
145 |
21 |
14.5% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
2005 |
??? |
?? |
??.?% |
1 |
??? |
|
|
122 |
24 |
19.7% |
1 |
222 |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
1983 |
50 |
34 |
68.0% |
1 |
??? |
|
|
1984 |
70 |
33 |
47.1% |
2 |
??? |
|
|
1985 |
??? |
??? |
??? |
1 |
??? |
|
|
1986 |
125 |
45 |
36.0% |
2 |
??? |
|
|
1987 |
94 |
42 |
44.7% |
2 |
??? |
|
|
1988 |
116 |
32 |
27.6% |
1 |
??? |
|
|
1989 |
94 |
29 |
30.9% |
1 |
??? |
|
|
1990 |
102 |
31 |
30.4% |
1 |
??? |
|
|
128 |
28 |
21.9% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
126 |
27 |
22.0% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
149 |
28 |
18.8% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
94 |
29 |
30.9% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
143 |
30 |
21.0% |
1 |
400 |
||
|
162 |
27 |
16.7% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
213 |
24 |
11.3% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
226 |
27 |
12.0% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
190 |
24 |
12.6% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
238 |
26 |
10.9% |
1 |
407 |
||
|
203 |
23 |
11.3% |
1 |
550 |
||
|
300 |
25 |
8.33% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
319 |
33 |
10.3% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
340 |
31 |
9.11% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
255 |
27 |
10.6% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
298 |
37 |
12.4% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
258 |
35 |
13.6% |
1 |
??? |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
1989 |
136 |
22 |
16.1% |
1 |
??? |
|
|
1990 |
102 |
23 |
22.3% |
1 |
??? |
|
|
1991 |
??? |
20 |
??.?% |
1 |
??? |
|
|
1992 |
108 |
20 |
18.5% |
1 |
??? |
|
|
1993 |
??? |
22 |
??.?% |
1 |
??? |
|
|
1994 |
110 |
25 |
22.7% |
1 |
??? |
|
|
1995 |
123 |
27 |
21.9% |
1 |
??? |
|
|
1996 |
110 |
24 |
21.8% |
1 |
??? |
|
|
1997 |
130 |
25 |
19.2% |
1 |
??? |
|
|
1998 |
136 |
25 |
18.4% |
1 |
??? |
|
|
92 |
18 |
19.6% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
165 |
28 |
17.0% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
233 |
30 |
12.9% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
170 |
23 |
13.5% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
222 |
26 |
11.7% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
265 |
33 |
12.4% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
237 |
31 |
13.1% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
217 |
30 |
13.8% |
1 |
140 |
||
|
170 |
29 |
17.1% |
1 |
??? |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
1995 |
84 |
22 |
26.2% |
1 |
??? |
|
|
1996 |
??? |
??? |
??? |
??? |
??? |
|
|
120 |
23 |
19.2% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
90 |
19 |
21.1% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
85 |
17 |
20.0% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
128 |
22 |
17.2% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
155 |
20 |
12.9% |
1 |
??? |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
230 |
67 |
29.1% |
2.5 |
??? |
||
|
207 |
60 |
29.0% |
2.5 |
7000 |
||
|
192 |
59 |
30.7% |
2.5 |
???? |
||
|
260 |
63 |
24.2% |
2.5 |
???? |
||
|
239 |
54 |
22.6% |
2.5 |
9700 |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
130 |
28 |
21.5% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
74 |
23 |
31.1% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
87 |
23 |
26.4% |
1 |
1200 |
||
|
63 |
23 |
36.5% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
90 |
27 |
30.0% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
82 |
24 |
29.2% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
107 |
25 |
23.4% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
103 |
24 |
23.3% |
2 |
??? |
||
|
164 |
21 |
12.8% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
118 |
24 |
20.3% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
153 |
21 |
13.7% |
1 |
??? |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
85 |
23 |
27.1% |
1 |
185 |
||
|
67 |
22 |
32.8% |
1 |
150 |
||
|
70 |
19 |
27.1% |
1 |
??? |
||
|
76 |
21 |
27.6% |
1 |
??? |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
ACM VANET |
43 |
16 |
37.2% |
1 |
??? |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
1146 |
450 |
39.3% |
7 |
??? |
||
|
2400 |
720 |
30.0% |
7 |
??? |
||
|
1200 |
600 |
50.0% |
7 |
??? |
||
|
1600 |
650 |
40.6% |
7 |
??? |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
384 |
300 |
78.1% |
? |
??? |
||
|
568 |
167 |
29.4% |
? |
??? |
||
|
730+ |
377 |
52% |
? |
??? |
||
|
1087 |
470 |
43.2% |
3 |
??? |
||
|
2005 |
? |
? |
? |
? |
? |
|
|
2006 |
? |
? |
? |
? |
? |
|
|
1721 |
815 |
47.4% |
15 |
??? |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
23 |
23 |
100.0% |
1 |
22 |
||
|
35 |
35 |
100.0% |
1 |
45 |
||
|
35 |
20 |
57.1% |
1 |
124 |
||
|
38 |
19 |
50.0% |
1 |
123 |
||
|
35 |
16 |
45.7% |
1 |
110 |
||
|
61 |
20 |
32.8% |
1 |
132 |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
WMASH (ACM) |
29 |
10 |
34.5% |
1 |
??? |
|
|
47 |
15 |
31.9% |
1 |
48 |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
WMI (ACM) |
28 |
12 |
42.8% |
1 |
??? |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
WoWMoM (ACM) |
48 |
12 |
25.0% |
1 |
??? |
|
|
144 |
48 |
33.3% |
1 |
??? |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
WORM (ACM) |
37 |
9 |
24.3% |
1 |
??? |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
WQoSR |
28 |
8 |
28.6% |
1 |
103 (QofIS, ICQT and WQoSR) |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
WWIC |
2002 |
18 |
8 |
44.4% |
1 |
20 |
|
2004 |
60 |
26 |
43.3% |
1 |
40 |
|
|
2005 |
117 |
34 |
29.1% |
1 |
56 |
|
|
142 |
29 |
20.4% |
1 |
51 |
|
Event Name |
Year |
Submitted |
Accepted |
% Accepted |
Tracks |
Attendees |
|
WWW |
304 |
48 |
15.8% |
3 |
??? |
|
|
280 |
57 |
20.4% |
3 |
??? |
||
|
391 |
78 |
19.9% |
3 |
??? |
||
|
454 |
72 |
15.9% |
3 |
??? |
||
|
2003 |
??? |
?? |
??.?% |
3 |
??? |
|
|
506 |
74 |
14.6% |
3 |
??? |
||
|
550 |
77 |
14.0% |
3 |
~1000 |
||
|
667 |
75 |
11.2% |
3 |
??? |
||
|
750 |
111 |
14.8% |
3 |
??? |

